Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource research Media and Technology
This "mini-poster," a two-page slideshow presenting an overview of the project, was presented at the 2023 AISL Awardee Meeting.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: John Voiklis Jena Barchas-Lichtenstein
resource research Museum and Science Center Programs
This toolkit shares guidelines, resources, and curricula materials that were developed and refined over the project period.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Rachel Fyler Ian Chandler-Campbell Tess Harvey Allison Anderson Katie Todd Becki Kipling Peter Blake
resource evaluation Informal/Formal Connections
This report summarizes findings from the learning event and includes the two instruments developed as part of this project:  The STEM Advocacy Survey which is a 36-item measure that includes four subscales that measure components of STEM Advocacy, including Value of STEM for Society, Knowledge of STEM Advocacy, STEM Advocacy Efficacy, and STEM Advocacy Identification; and the STEM Engagement Survey for Older Adults, a ten-item scale adapted for older populations from a previously developed instrument designed for youth (ActivationLab.org) measuring behavioral, cognitive, and affective
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Jennifer Mangold Sarah Olsen Cheryl Brewster Matthew Cannady
resource research Higher Education Programs
The project team published a research synopsis article with Futurum Science Careers in Feb 2023 called “How Can Place Attachment Improve Scientific Literacy?”
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Julia Parrish Benjamin Haywood
resource research Higher Education Programs
The Museum of Science, Boston and Boston University received funding from the National Science Foundation to develop and implement a pilot program mentoring high school students in science research, communication, and education practices, through the lens of experimental psychology research.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Rachel Fyler Katie Todd Becki Kipling
resource research K-12 Programs
The Museum of Science, Boston and Boston University received funding from the National Science Foundation to develop and implement a pilot program mentoring high school students in science research, communication, and education practices, through the lens of experimental psychology research.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Katie Todd Ian Chandler-Campbell Rachel Fyler
resource research K-12 Programs
The Museum of Science, Boston and Boston University received funding from the National Science Foundation to develop and implement a pilot program mentoring high school students in science research, communication, and education practices, through the lens of experimental psychology research
DATE:
resource research Exhibitions
The open-access proceedings from this conference are available in both English and Spanish.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: John Voiklis Jena Barchas-Lichtenstein Uduak Grace Thomas Bennett Attaway Lisa Chalik Jason Corwin Kevin Crowley Michelle Ciurria Colleen Cotter Martina Efeyini Ronnie Janoff-Bulman Jacklyn Grace Lacey Reyhaneh Maktoufi Bertram Malle Jo-Elle Mogerman Laura Niemi Laura Santhanam
resource research Community Outreach Programs
Reflections and Ideas about Collaboration with Integrity explores the work Generations of Knowledge: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Environmental Science (National Science Foundation DRL-1010559), a six-year collaborative project between OMSI and Native partners from diverse tribes, cultures, and ecoregions that co-created traveling exhibits and programs for science and tribal museums. This legacy document reflects on and shares what we learned on this journey, including our detours and course corrections. The legacy document strongly reflects the work of the whole project both in its
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Victoria Coats Cecilia Nguyen Molly Schmitz Jaclyn Barber Tim Hecox Marilyn Johnson Kyrie Thompson Kellett Tim Steeves Leah Gibson (Oglala Lakota) David Begay Diné [Navajo]) Inez Bill (Tulalip/Lummi) Karen Kitchen (Osage) Katherine Krile Herb Lee, Jr. (Hawaiian) VerlieAnn Malina-Wright (Hawaiian) Nancy Maryboy (Cherokee/Diné [Navajo]) Randall Melton (Seminole/CTUIR) Wenix Red Elk (CTUIR) David Cozzo Vicki Cruz (Cherokee) Deana Dartt (Chumash) Jill Stein Shelly Valdez (Laguna Pueblo) Pamela Woodis (Jicarilla Apache) Tessa Campbell (Tulalip)
resource evaluation Public Programs
How to determine a sample size for studying your informal learning program What’s important to consider when selecting a sample size, or participant group size, for studying your informal (science) education program? What value does a small sample size have? If program managers have ample resources for collecting a lot of data, what factors are important to consider? Here is a collection of guidelines and examples for use in making an informed decision about determining the sample size for studying your informal learning program. To design a study whose findings are more authentic
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Rebecca Cors
resource research Public Programs
This poster was presented at the 2021 NSF AISL Awardee Meeting. This poster describes a newly funded collaborative project (9/2021) to engage Planet Word visitors in language science research. Engage visitors in domain of science often overlooked in the public imagination (language arts -> language science enthusiasts!) Diversify participants who contribute data to studies Provide training in research & science communication to a diverse group of students across a range of institutions, including MSIs, broadening participation in STEM Lower barrier to entry for other language
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Charlotte Vaughn Deanna Gagne Patrick Plummer Yi Ting Huang
resource research Public Programs
Diversity, Equity, Access and Inclusion (DEAI) work in museums is multifaceted, but typically approached from the perspective of external audiences and outcomes rather than a change in internal organizational culture. This article discusses findings from a research study examining what happened in five US science museums that were making a concerted, officially recognized effort towards internal change, and explores what those findings reveal about field-wide barriers to appreciable systemic change along with the impacts of the current status quo on marginalized staff. This study focused
DATE: