Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation
Measures elementary school children's attitudes towards science in a learning context.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Harold Harty Dwight Beall
resource evaluation
This is part three of the four part "Classroom Activities and Outcomes Survey." The survey asks students to rate the progress they have made in science process skills as a result of completing a particular course or program.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Patrick T. Terenzini Alberto F. Cabrera Carol L. Colbeck John M. Parente Stefani A. Bjorklund
resource evaluation
This evaluation instrument was developed for Exploring Physics, an extra curricular program for 5-7 grade students, with a focus on female students. It is part of an NSF funded program entitled Promoting Young Women in the Physical Sciences.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Meera Chandrasekhar Jennifer Geib
resource evaluation
The tool was created by 4H Nebraska to measure students’ (7-10th graders ) learning and attitudes towards science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The tool also assesses students’ attitude about GPS (Global Positioning Systems) and GIS (Geographical Imaging Systems).
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Bradley Barker Debra K. Meier
resource evaluation
To evaluate the reasons for students in abandoning the science, engineering, and medical (SEM) pipeline while others choosing to continue. The influence of family and teachers on students’ goals in science, activities, and science identity is considered.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Pamela R. Aschbacher Erika Li Ellen J. Roth
resource evaluation
Measures students' attitudes towards science related to such factors as students' perceptions of the science teacher, anxiety toward science, value of science in society, self-concept toward science and desire to do science.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Molly H. Weinburgh Donald Steele
resource evaluation Informal/Formal Connections
The New Ecological Paradigm for Children is modeled after the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) and the New Ecological Paradigm-Revised (NEP-Revised) for adults. The survey contains 10 questions assessing three subscales that contribute to one’s “environmental world view” including “rights of nature,” “eco-crisis,” and “human exceptionalism.”
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Constantinos C. Manoli Bruce Johnson Riley E. Dunlap
resource evaluation
LAESE is designed to identify longitudinal changes in the self-efficacy of undergraduate students studying engineering. (see AWE Self-Efficacy Literature Overview and Information on Self-Efficacy). LAESE can be used with any students studying engineering. A High School instrument, based on LAESE, was developed and tested by the Female Recruits Explore Engineering (FREE) Project.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Pennsylvania State University University of Missouri
resource evaluation
The Science Motivation Questionnaire II is a reliable and validated survey that assesses science motivation based on 5-factors (intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, career motivation, self-determination, grade motivation).
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Shawn Glynn
resource evaluation Public Programs
This report evaluates the nanotechnology-related presentations delivered at the Museum of Science, Boston, in an effort to more effectively educate the public. Interview questions used in this study are included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elissa Chin Elizabeth Kollmann Barbara Flagg
resource evaluation Public Programs
The 2010 Delivery and Reach study documented the delivery of nano education activities at NISE Network partner institutions and estimated the public reach of those activities. Surveys used in this study are included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Scott Pattison Marcie Benne Jenna LeComte-Hinely
resource research Informal/Formal Connections
This article describes the goals and methodology of the Field Museum in Chicago's Calumet Environmental Education Program (CEEP) in the Calumet region of southeast Chicago. The program engages students grades 4-12 in science by letting them apply what they have learned to real-life community conservation issues. Evaluation highlights and lessons learned are also included.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Kirk Anne Taylor Katie McCarthy