Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

Current Search

resource research Public Programs
In April 2001, the Museum of Science in Boston launched the Current Science & Technology Center, an effort to address leading edge research for school and public audiences and to provide depth and context for science and technology stories in the news within a museum context and through various outreach methods. The Museum of Science (MOS), in collaboration with the Institute for Learning Innovation (Institute), has initiated a multi-year evaluation effort designed to support the Current Science & Technology Center and its Health Science Education Partnership through (1) the monitoring and
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Institute for Learning Innovation Martin Storksdieck Mika Cohen Jones John H Falk Carol Lynn Alpert
resource research Public Programs
In response to a long-expressed focus on a museum's mission and its evaluation, this article explores an alternate model of multiple, intentional missions and purposes. While literature and theory assume that a single mission should guide a museum's decisions and actions, in practice, many US nonprofit museums are operating as community service museums, intentionally fulfilling a number of different purposes useful and desired by the community beyond the purpose stated in their mission. This article builds on Stephen E. Weil's theories to develop the rationale for measuring the value and
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: The White Oak Institute John W. Jacobsen
resource evaluation Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing (CHN) brings together three universities with unique strengths in nanoscience and nanomanufacturing: the University of Massachusetts, Lowell (UML); Northeastern University, Boston (NEU); and the University of New Hampshire, Durham (UNH). The University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute (UMDI) is conducting the five-year evaluation of CHN's education and outreach activities. The evaluation uses multiple sources of evidence to analyze project processes and outcomes. Using quantitative and qualitative
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing Carol Lynn Alpert Carol Barry
resource evaluation Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing (CHN) brings together three universities with unique strengths in nanoscience and nanomanufacturing: the University of Massachusetts, Lowell (UML); Northeastern University, Boston (NEU); and the University of New Hampshire, Durham (UNH). The University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute (UMDI) is conducting the five-year evaluation of CHN's education and outreach activities. The evaluation uses multiple sources of evidence to analyze project processes and outcomes. Using quantitative and qualitative
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing Carol Lynn Alpert Carol Barry UMass Donahue Institute Research and Evaluation Group
resource research Public Programs
This report presents findings from a national exploratory study on professional knowledge and attitudes surrounding science identity as an applicable theory for understanding experiences in informal science education (ISE) environments. The study was distributed by email to 2,500 names on the Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE)’s mailing list. The survey received an 11% complete response rate with 288 complete responses, and another 181 partial responses, and an average of 15 years experience working in the ISE field for all complete respondents. The results
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Institute for Learning Innovation John Fraser Patricia Ward
resource evaluation Media and Technology
Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF),The STEM Pathways project focused on exploring strategies through which at-risk and incarcerated Hispanic youth could be engaged around STEM careers, understand the education, training, and skills they would need to attain them, and think that such a path was a future possibility. To this end, the project and evaluation teams collaborated on a literature review, the development of a logic model, and the design, implementation, and evaluation of a diverse set of program activities that included media, art, and flash mentoring with STEM role models
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Valerie Knight-Williams Lynn Dierking Carlos Alcazar Alliyah Noor
resource evaluation Media and Technology
Funded by NSF, Earth: The Operators’ Manual (ETOM) is a users’ guide to the present and future energy resources of our planet, providing “users” with the information, attitudes and tools to make wiser choices about powering homes, schools, businesses and communities. ETOM uses a hybrid model of science communication including video + in-person presentations + Web 2.0 social networking. Rockman et al evaluated project impact, working from front-end to summative stages to understand the reactions of media, online and on-site audiences using both qualitative and quantitative measures to look at
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Rockman et al Camellia Sanford-Dolly Saul Rockman Katie White Walters
resource research Public Programs
The requirement by the National Science Foundation (NSF) that research proposals include plans for "broader impact" activities to foster connections between Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) research and service to society has been controversial since it was first introduced. A chief complaint is that the requirement diverts time and resources from the focus of research and toward activities for which researchers may not be well prepared. This paper describes the theoretical framework underlying a new strategy to pair NSF-funded nano research centres with science museums in
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Museum of Science, Boston Carol Lynn Alpert
resource research Public Programs
To conserve species, we must first identify them. Field researchers, land managers, educators, and citizen scientists need up-to-date and accessible tools to identify organisms, organize data, and share observations. Emerging technologies complement traditional, book-form field guides by providing users with a wealth of multimedia data. We review technical innovations of next-generation field guides, including Web-based and stand-alone applications, interactive multiple-access keys, visual-recognition software adapted to identify organisms, species checklists that can be customized to
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: New England Wild Flower Society Elizabeth Farnsworth Miyoko Chu W. John Kress Jason Best John Pickering Robert Stevenson Gregory Courtney John VanDyck Aaron Ellison
resource research Media and Technology
These audio presentation and transcript files are from a series of webinars about the NSF Advancing Informal STEM Learning (AISL) FY14 solicitation. "AISL Webinar 101: Introduction to the Solicitation" includes an overview of the AISL program, project types, preparing competitive proposals, the review process and NSF merit criteria, other relevant programs and resources, and contact information. "AISL Webinar 102: Digging Deeper into the Solicitation" focuses on key issues in the submission and review processes, examples of project types, an introduction to the Common Guidelines for Education
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: National Science Foundation National Science Foundation
resource research Public Programs
The National Science Foundation (NSF) has tried to narrow the gap between science and society with its Broader Impacts requirement. The authors analyzed the proposed broader impacts of proposals funded by NSF's Ecosystems Studies Program (i.e. the activities that provide benefice to society through teaching, broadening participation, enhancing infrastructure, and disseminating research). They obtained all of the abstracts of funded proposals from NSF's website and characterized the scope of the proposed broader impacts activities in 296 propels (2000-2010). Only 65% of abstracts included a
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: The Evergreen State College Nalini Nadkarni Amy E Stasch
resource research Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
The analysis contained in this report was prepared for the CAISE Convening on Broader Impacts & ISE. The report summarizes interviews with researchers in STEM subjects who were asked about: 1) their perceptions about broader impacts, 2) the planning and process that researchers undertake for broader impacts activities, 3) the resources and supports that currently exist and that researchers would like to exist for broader impacts activities, and 4) how the informal science education field might "market" itself as a potential place to find partners or venues for doing broader impacts activities
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning Julie Risien John H Falk