Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation Public Programs
In 2006, the Institute for Advanced Learning and Research (IALR) received a three-year grant from the National Science Foundation's Information/Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) division to create the Dan River Information Technology Academy (DRITA) for under-served high school students in rural Virginia. The only program of its kind in Southern Virginia, the program was designed to provide participating students with competencies in information technology (IT) and workforce skills. In addition, the program seeks to encourage students to graduate from high
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Irene Goodman Lorraine Dean Miriam Kochman Helena Pylvainen Colleen Manning Karen Peterman Institute of Advanced Learning and Research
resource evaluation Exhibitions
Science Under Sail: Russia's Great Voyages to America 1728-1867 opened in May 2000 at the Anchorage Museum of History and Art (AMHA) for a five-month run. Developed by Curator Barbara Sweetland Smith and designed by Presentation Design Group, Science Under Sail was a 5,340-square-foot exhibition consisting of 44 elements, including text and graphic panels, cases with artifacts and specimens, audio stations, ship models, dioramas, and interactive elements. Overhead banners separated the exhibition into five sections: Why did they sail? Where did they go? How did they get there? What did they
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Beverly Serrell Anchorage Museum of History and Art
resource evaluation
To evaluate the reasons for students in abandoning the science, engineering, and medical (SEM) pipeline while others choosing to continue. The influence of family and teachers on students’ goals in science, activities, and science identity is considered.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Pamela R. Aschbacher Erika Li Ellen J. Roth
resource evaluation Public Programs
This report is the formative evaluation for the “Computing the Future” presentation, a presentation concerned with both the history of computers and the ways in which nanotechnology is changing how computers are built and operated. The survey used in this study is included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Kerry Bronnenkant
resource evaluation Public Programs
This report evaluates the program entitled “Treating Tumors with Gold” by looking at visitor feedback in an attempt to assess the success with which the presentation was able to educate the public on a particular study using nanotechnology. The exit survey instrument is included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elizabeth Kunz Kullmann
resource evaluation Media and Technology
The Nanomedicine Explorer kiosk at the Museum of Science, Boston provides opportunities to learn about nanomedicine, nanotechnology, cancer biology, new research in cancer diagnosis and therapy, and the process of medical research from bench to bedside. This report is the formative evaluation of the prototype of this kiosk, presenting the results of visitor observations, exit surveys, and interviews. The findings of these data served to provide the Nanomedicine Explorer production team a basis from which to make improvements to the program, which was released as Version 1.0 in May of 2009
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Kerry Bronnenkant Carol Lynn Alpert
resource evaluation Public Programs
The 2010 Delivery and Reach study documented the delivery of nano education activities at NISE Network partner institutions and estimated the public reach of those activities. Surveys used in this study are included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Scott Pattison Marcie Benne Jenna LeComte-Hinely
resource evaluation Public Programs
Summative evaluation of four programs created by the NISE Network. The survey instrument used in this study is included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
resource evaluation Public Programs
The Nanoawareness Study is designed to answer the question "What, if any, impact do NISE Net activities delivered at Tier 1 and Tier 2 institutions have on the nanoawareness of the public audiences that experience those activities?" The Nanoawareness Study was initially conducted in Year 3 and then replicated in Year 4 with some methodological changes and a different sample of participants. The following report describes the Nanoawareness Study findings from Year 4 in comparison to findings from Year 3. This appendix of this report includes the online survey instrument used in the study.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Brett Kiser Marcie Benne
resource evaluation Professional Development, Conferences, and Networks
The Museum of Science partnered with the Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing to create a sequence of professional development experiences in science communication and hands-on learning for graduate students and post-docs. The Sharing Science Workshops were intended to help graduate students who work with the CHN program to improve their abilities to present their research to a variety of scientific and nonscientific audiences. The sequence included a half-day "Sharing Science" workshop, a half-day guided "Practicum" with museum visitors, and optional participation in NanoDays events at MOS
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Donahue Institute Research and Evaluation Group
resource research
This is a guide to creating public conversations about nanoscience. Includes evaluation tools.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Brad Herring
resource evaluation Public Programs
The NISE Network program evaluation tools package includes guidelines and templates to facilitate in program evaluation
DATE: