Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation Public Programs
Bio Med Tech: Engineering for Your Health was a 2,750 square foot exhibition at the Great Lakes Science Center (GLSC) that dealt with issues related to biomedical technology. Partially funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health Science Education Partnership Awards program (NIH/SEPA), the project was developed through a partnership between GLSC and Case Western Reserve University. The SEPA grant also funded a variety of programming activities, including informal Exploration Cart activities in the exhibition, presentations in the exhibition's theater space, and teacher training
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Eric Gyllenhaal The Great Lakes Science Center
resource evaluation Media and Technology
This report presents an evaluation study of Soundprint Media's project, Out of This World (#0741737), which was funded by the National Science Foundation's Informal Science Education Program. The mission of the project was to introduce adult radio listeners and youth participants in museum events to the historical context and challenges faced by African-Americans and women who were involved as professionals in the United States' space program in the 1960's. The project website, capecosmos.com, included an interactive menu of activities set within the context of a NASA mission control center
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Robert Russell Soundprint Media
resource evaluation Media and Technology
The Luce Foundation Center (LFC) of the Smithsonian American Art Museum (hereafter, American Art or the Museum) ran an alternate reality game (ARG) titled PHEON (http://pheon.org/, http://apps.facebook.com/playpheon/register/) from September 2010 through August 2011. The game built upon the success of the Museum's previous ARG, Ghosts of a Chance (GOAC; http://ghostsofachance.com/; Goodlander, 2009), and was intended to increase familiarity with the Museum's collections, programs, and resources; highlight connections between the Museum and its collections with peoples' lives; and attract new
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Jes Koepfler Smithsonian American Art Museum
resource evaluation Public Programs
The Firefly Watch project is a citizen science program where a network of volunteers across the country observe and collect data on fireflies. Participants are able to post their results to the project website, where they can share aspects of their own experiences and learn about sightings in other locations. To evaluate this program, a brief survey was conducted that probed for participant interactions with the program, learning due to project involvement and areas for potential project growth.The attached file includes slides from the PowerPoint presentation that outline the key findings
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Leigh Ann Mesiti Christine Reich Museum of Science
resource evaluation Public Programs
The Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHM) contracted Randi Korn & Associates, Inc. (RK&A) to study visitor engagement in the Museum. The intent of this research was to deepen the NHM's understanding of its audiences by examining visitors' programmatic and content-driven experiences in the NHM. In addition, RK&A explored the qualities and characteristics associated with different types of visitors and identified how such characteristics determine visitors' level of engagement with the NHM. How did we approach this study? RK&A used a combination of standardized questionnaires and in
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Randi Korn & Associates, Inc. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
resource evaluation Public Programs
This study was conducted as part of the formative evaluation of the NISE Network Forum Nanomedicine in Healthcare. The purpose of the forum was to bring members of the public together to discuss the conditions under which nanotechnology applications in medicine and personal care products should be made available to the public. During the forum, participants learned about nanotechnology and its societal and ethical impacts from expert speakers, had chance to ask questions of the experts, participated in a small group discussion in which they talked about the pros and cons of releasing
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elizabeth Kollmann Christine Reich Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network
resource evaluation Public Programs
The Nanoawareness Study is designed to answer the question "What, if any, impact do NISE Net activities delivered at Tier 1 and Tier 2 institutions have on the nanoawareness of the public audiences that experience those activities?" The appendix of this report includes the online survey instrument used in the study.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Marcie Benne Brett Kiser Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network Christine Reich
resource evaluation Public Programs
The NISE Network Forums were created to provide an in-depth learning experience that would (1) enhance participants' understanding of nano and its potential impacts; (2) increase participants' confidence in participating in public discourse about nanotechnologies; and (3) build informal science educators' knowledge and ability to conduct this type of programming at their institution (NISE Network Public Forums Manual, 2007). In an effort to reach out to a more diverse audience, the NISE Network Forums Team translated into Spanish the existing NISE Net forum "Nanomedicine in Healthcare" to
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elizabeth Kollmann Jane Morgan Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network Roxana del Campo
resource evaluation Public Programs
In order to better understand how visitors to science and natural history museums connect to ideas around Indigenous knowledge and Western science, the Cosmic Serpent evaluation team (Institute for Learning Innovation and Native Pathways) conducted front-end audience research focused on audience perceptions and attitudes towards Indigenous ways of knowing and Western science in informal science settings.A total of 121 exit interviews were conducted with visitors to the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science in Albuquerque, NM, and to the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry in
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Jill Stein Shelly Valdez Tammy Messick University of California-Berkeley Indigenous Education Institute
resource evaluation Media and Technology
Research Questions: (1) To what extent do children's and parent's interest in math and science increase as a result of exposure to one or more of the project's components? (2) To what extent do children and parents want to engage further with Mateo y Cientina after initial exposure to the cartoon through one or more of the project's components? (3) To what extent do parents and children think they've learned new concepts about math and science as a result of completing a Mateo y Cientina activity? (4) To what extent do parents and children gain confidence in their understanding of math and
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Sarah Mushlin University of California Colleen Kuusinen
resource evaluation Public Programs
The Review of NISE Network Evaluation Findings: Years 1-5 seeks to investigate the work of the NISE Network since its inception in 2005 and provide an overarching summary of NISE Net Public Impacts evaluation efforts to the NISE Network and the broader ISE field. This Review is divided into six chapters, representing the following themes: Connecting ISE Professionals with Nano Informal Science Education; Connecting University-Affiliated Individuals with Nano Informal Science Education;Engaging the Public in Learning about Nano through NISE Network Educational Products;Engaging the Public with
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Christine Reich Elizabeth Kollmann Jane Morgan Alexander Amy Grack Nelson Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network
resource evaluation Media and Technology
This report presents a summary of findings from our evaluation and conclusions that may carry broader implications. The audience for this report includes The National Science Foundation (NSF) and other funders (particularly science research funders), the leadership and staff of Nanotechnology: the Convergence of Science and Society project partners, and the informal science education field. The main body of the report is organized into two sections. The first section discusses the project's logic model, or theory of action and frames what the project set out to do and how. The project's
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Mark St. John Pamela Castori Oregon Public Broadcasting Judy Hirabayashi