Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation Public Programs
This report is the first annual report summarizing data collected about the overall impact of the Saint Louis Science Center's educational programs on participants. Data was collected between September 2006 to August 2007. Four programs, Summer Science Blast, FIRST Robotics, YES-2-Tech, and Learning Place, are spotlighted.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Jennifer Heim Elisa Israel Saint Louis Science Center
resource evaluation Media and Technology
The Science Museum of Minnesota (SMM) contracted Randi Korn & Associates, Inc. (RK&A) to simultaneously conduct a remedial evaluation of the exhibition Tissues of Life and its associated elements: the Web site with the same name, presentations at the Demonstration Station, and the What is Life?, play. The National Institutes of Health funded all elements. Data collection took place between July and October 2003. Three data collection strategies were employed: timing and tracking observations, uncued exit interviews, and telephone interviews. Additionally, to understand presenters' experiences
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Randi Korn & Associates, Inc. Science Museum of Minnesota
resource evaluation Public Programs
How Did We Approach This Study This report presents findings of a program evaluation conducted by Randi Korn & Associates, Inc. (RK&A), for the Hiller Aviation Museum in San Carlos, California. The evaluation examined learning outcomes and experiences of 6th to 8th grade Boy Scouts attending the Hiller Aviation Museum's Flight Planning Program to earn an Aviation Scout Merit Badge. The full-day program was offered one Saturday a month in October, November, and December 2010. RK&A designed pre- and post-test standardized questionnaires to explore Boy Scouts' understanding of the importance of
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Randi Korn & Associates, Inc. Hiller Aviation Museum
resource evaluation Museum and Science Center Programs
The NISE Net Public Impacts Summative Evaluation focuses on measuring the public outcomes and impacts of NISE Net activities. The design of the evaluation studies is driven by a program theory model that maps the pathways NISE Net has developed for delivering nanoscale science, engineering and technology (NSET) programs and exhibits to the public, as identified by the summative evaluation team. Built into the NISE Net program theory model is an assumption that the Network will reach a large number of people by distributing the Network's public outreach efforts across a large number of
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Christine Reich Juli Goss Nanoscale Informal Science Education (NISE) Network
resource evaluation Public Programs
This study was conducted as a part of the formative evaluation of the NISE Network forum Nanotechnology: Risks, Benefits, and Who Decides? The purpose of the forum was to bring members of the public together to discuss whether experts, watchdogs, and/or the public should be the primary decision makers about nanotechnology policy. During the course of the forum, participants learned about nanotechnology and its societal and ethical implications from experts, had a chance to ask questions of the experts, participated in a small group discussion where they talked about the pros and cons of the
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elizabeth Kollmann Christine Reich Anna Lindgren-Streicher Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network
resource evaluation Public Programs
The NSF-funded Nanoscale Informal Science Education (NISE) Network produced exhibits and programs designed to develop awareness, engagement, and understanding of nanoscale science, engineering, and technology in the museum-going public. As part of the overall summative evaluation of the first five years of this grant, the Exhibits and Programs Study examines the measurable impacts of these public products on museum visitors. These exhibits and programs were developed during the first four years of the project as the NISE Network itself was growing and developing; the products show the strength
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Marjorie Bequette Gina Navoa Svarovsky Kirsten Ellenbogen Nanoscale Informal Science Education
resource evaluation Public Programs
The Salmon Camp Research Team (SCRT) project was created to address the under-representation of Native Americans in information technology (IT) and IT-intensive professions in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI) is partnering with the Native American Youth and Family Association (NAYA) under the renewed National Science Foundation (NSF) funding to strengthen community involvement and work directly with students year round. An SCRT program website is under development with program information and a social networking page
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Phyllis Ault Oregon Museum of Science and Industry
resource evaluation Public Programs
During Year 1 of the Nanoscale Informal Science Education (NISE) Network, the Exhibits and Programs group, led by the Science Museum of Minnesota, conducted a marketing survey in an effort to find out what kinds of nano exhibits and programs institutions would find most useful, and what other forms of assistance the NISE Network could provide. Individuals from a total of 34 institutions (out of 48) completed the online survey for a 71% response rate. Key Findings: Respondents were most interested in the topics of nanoscience applied to biology, human body, and medicine (94%) and environmental
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Amy Grack Nelson Kirsten Ellenbogen Nanoscale Informal Science Education (NISE) Network
resource evaluation Public Programs
The Nanoscale Informal Science Education (NISE) Network held an online workshop in February 2010 focused on NanoDays and activities in the NanoDays kit. A formative evaluation was designed to measure workshop outcomes and identify necessary improvements for future NanoDays workshops and inform other NISE Net online workshops. The outcomes stated that workshop participants would 1) become more familiar with the NISE Network, 2) become familiar with what NanoDays resources are available on nisenet.org and how to find them, 3) increase their comfort level using NanoDays activities with their
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Amy Grack Nelson Gayra Ostgaard Kathleen Miller Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network
resource evaluation Public Programs
It is relatively unknown what impact the Museum of Science has on its visitors once they leave our doors. This study aims to create a baseline understanding of how visitors follow up on what they have learned at the Museum. We examined follow up interviews from the Star Wars: Where Science Meets the Imagination exhibition evaluation and some of its accompanying programming, the Rethinking Urban Transportation forums, Bionics and Prosthetics forums, and The Force and Its Many Faces lectures. The follow up interviews were conducted via email and phone six to 10 weeks after visitors came to the
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elissa Chin Christine Reich Museum of Science
resource evaluation Media and Technology
Exploring Life's Origins is a project funded by the National Science Foundation through the Discovery Corps Postdoctoral Fellowship. Janet Iwasa was the recipient of this grant, and her goals were to help the public understand research on the origins of life conducted in the labs of Dr. Jack Szostak from Harvard University/Massachusetts General Hospital and the Center for Origins Research by creating molecular visualizations based on the research and communicating to the public scientific research concepts related to the origins of life. The science communication portion of this project was
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elizabeth Kollmann Anna Lindgren-Streicher Harvard University Massachusetts General Hospital
resource evaluation Public Programs
In an effort to learn more about ways the Museum of Science can revise its existing comment card system so that it can better monitor the quality of the visitor experience, the Museum of Science Research and Evaluation Department, under the guidance of the Visitor Services division, set out to accomplish the following goals: Develop a detailed system for coding comments provided through the museum's existing electronic and physical comment cards; Determine the main visitor concerns that were expressed through the current comment card reporting system; and Explore how alternative sampling
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elizabeth Kollmann Christine Reich Museum of Science