Skip to main content
COMMUNITY:
Peer-reviewed article

What’s Next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions

June 26, 2009 | Media and Technology
In this essay, we review research from the social sciences on how the public makes sense of and participates in societal decisions about science and technology. We specifically highlight the role of the media and public communication in this process, challenging the still dominant assumption that science literacy is both the problem and the solution to societal conflicts. After reviewing the cases of evolution, climate change, food biotechnology, and nanotechnology, we offer a set of detailed recommendations for improved public engagement efforts on the part of scientists and their organizations. We emphasize the need for science communication initiatives that are guided by careful formative research; that span a diversity of media platforms and audiences; and that facilitate conversations with the public that recognize, respect, and incorporate differences in knowledge, values, perspectives, and goals.

TEAM MEMBERS

  • Matthew Nisbet
    Author
    American University
  • Dietram Scheufele
    Author
    University of Wisconsin
  • Citation

    Publication Name: American Journal of Botany
    Volume: 96
    Number: 10
    Page Number: 1767

    Funders

    Resource Type: Research Products
    Discipline: Climate | Education and learning science | General STEM | Nature of science | Social science and psychology
    Audience: Museum/ISE Professionals | Scientists
    Environment Type: Media and Technology | Broadcast Media

    If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.