Skip to main content

Community Repository Search Results

resource evaluation
Assesses children's interest in, attitude towards, and experiences in science and technology, as well as their opinion about environmental challenges and career aspirations.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Svein Sjøberg
resource evaluation
The Science Motivation Questionnaire II is a reliable and validated survey that assesses science motivation based on 5-factors (intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, career motivation, self-determination, grade motivation).
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Shawn Glynn
resource evaluation
Assesses current interest and attitudes in science activities at school.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Helen Gibson Christopher Chase
resource evaluation
The inventory consists of eleven items, each representing a different skill in the science inquiry process. Youth are prompted to respond to each statement using a 4-point Likert scale indicating how often they practice each of the items when doing science: Never (1), sometimes (2), usually (3), and always (4). Recommended scoring of the SPSI is the calculation of a composite science process skills score. This is calculated by summing the individual ratings for each item. The score range for the composite score is 11-44.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Mary E. Arnold Virginia Bourdeau
resource evaluation
Assesses students interest in science, their attitudes toward science, their views of scientists, and their desire to become scientists.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Richard W. Moore Rachel Leigh Hill Foy
resource evaluation
"Monitors" students' views concerning the epistemological, social & technological aspects of science.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Glen S. Aikenhead Alan G. Ryan Reg W. Fleming
resource evaluation Public Programs
This report is the formative evaluation for the “Computing the Future” presentation, a presentation concerned with both the history of computers and the ways in which nanotechnology is changing how computers are built and operated. The survey used in this study is included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Kerry Bronnenkant
resource evaluation Public Programs
This report evaluates the program entitled “Treating Tumors with Gold” by looking at visitor feedback in an attempt to assess the success with which the presentation was able to educate the public on a particular study using nanotechnology. The exit survey instrument is included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elizabeth Kunz Kullmann
resource evaluation Media and Technology
The Nanomedicine Explorer kiosk at the Museum of Science, Boston provides opportunities to learn about nanomedicine, nanotechnology, cancer biology, new research in cancer diagnosis and therapy, and the process of medical research from bench to bedside. This report is the formative evaluation of the prototype of this kiosk, presenting the results of visitor observations, exit surveys, and interviews. The findings of these data served to provide the Nanomedicine Explorer production team a basis from which to make improvements to the program, which was released as Version 1.0 in May of 2009
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Kerry Bronnenkant Carol Lynn Alpert
resource evaluation Media and Technology
This formative evaluation was conducted to see how the addition of an interactive media piece enhanced visitors' understanding of Nasturtium, a life sciences exhibit that demonstrates the water repelling properties of nasturtium leaves. The media piece allows the visitor to view leaf structures at progressively higher magnifications to better illustrate their scale and function. The interview questions used in this study are included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Adam Klinger
resource evaluation Media and Technology
This report documents two formative evaluations on an interactive media piece that allows its users to zoom in from a human hand to an atom. This zoom uses a spiral to connote zooming and is a departure from a more conventional zoom in which each successive image is a magnification of a portion of the preceding image. Interview protocols are included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Joyce Ma
resource evaluation Public Programs
This report evaluates the nanotechnology-related presentations delivered at the Museum of Science, Boston, in an effort to more effectively educate the public. Interview questions used in this study are included in the appendix of this report.
DATE:
TEAM MEMBERS: Elissa Chin Elizabeth Kollmann Barbara Flagg