Scientific debates in modern societies often blur the lines between the science that is being debated and the political, moral, and legal implications that come with its societal applications. This manuscript traces the origins of this phenomenon to professional norms within the scientific discipline and to the nature and complexities of modern science and offers an expanded model of science communication that takes into account the political contexts in which science communication takes place. In a second step, it explores what we know from empirical work in political communication, public opinion research, and communication research about the dynamics that determine how issues are debated and attitudes are formed in political environments. Finally, it discusses how and why it will be increasingly important for science communicators to draw from these different literatures to ensure that the voice of the scientific community is heard in the broader societal debates surrounding science.
TEAM MEMBERS
Dietram Scheufele
Author
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Citation
Publication Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume:
111
Number:
Supplement 4
Page Number:
13585–13592
Funders
NSF
Award Number:
0937591
NSF
Award Number:
0832760
NSF
Funding Program:
AISL
Award Number:
0940143
If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.