Skip to main content
COMMUNITY:
Peer-reviewed article

Process, Not Product: Investigating Recommendations for Improving Citizen Science "Success"

May 1, 2013 | Public Programs
Citizen science programs are increasingly popular for a variety of reasons, from public education to new opportunities for data collection. The literature published in scientific journals resulting from these projects represents a particular perspective on the process. These articles often conclude with recommendations for increasing “success”. This study compared these recommendations to those elicited during interviews with program coordinators for programs within the United States. From this comparison, success cannot be unilaterally defined and therefore recommendations vary by perspective on success. Program coordinators tended to have more locally-tailored recommendations specific to particular aspects of their program mission.

TEAM MEMBERS

  • Amy Freitag
    Author
    Duke University
  • Max Pfeffer
    Author
    Cornell University
  • Citation

    DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0064079
    Publication Name: PLOS One
    Volume: 8
    Number: 5
    Resource Type: Research Products
    Discipline: Education and learning science | General STEM | Nature of science
    Audience: Educators/Teachers | Museum/ISE Professionals | Evaluators
    Environment Type: Public Programs | Citizen Science Programs

    If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.