Skip to main content
COMMUNITY:
Peer-reviewed article

Museum Evaluation Without Borders: Four Imperatives for Making Museum Evaluation More Relevant, Credible, and Useful

January 1, 2011 | Public Programs, Exhibitions
In this article, I invite readers to think outside of evaluation’s current boundaries and to see the deep connectedness between what museums hope to achieve and how we evaluate the extent to which these aspirations may be realized. To do this, I present four imperatives for making museum evaluation more relevant, credible, and useful: 1) Link program activities with intended outcomes and hoped-for impact. 2) Take a systems-oriented evaluation approach. 3) Use affirmative data collection approaches based on assets and strengths. 4) Engage in courageous conversations.

TEAM MEMBERS

  • Hallie Preskill
    Author
    FSG Social Impact Advisors
  • Citation

    DOI : 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2010.00072.x
    Publication Name: Curator: The Museum Journal
    Volume: 54
    Number: 1
    Page Number: 93
    Resource Type: Research Products
    Discipline: Education and learning science
    Audience: Museum/ISE Professionals | Evaluators
    Environment Type: Public Programs | Museum and Science Center Programs | Exhibitions | Museum and Science Center Exhibits

    If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.