In this article, Roger Miles, of the Natural History Museum in London, defends his 1993 proposal that deems the concept of remedial evaluation unnecessary. Miles presents counterarguments against proponents of remedial evaluation, Screven, Bitgood, and Shettel and argues for a classification based on the cyclical model of exhibition development.
Document
TEAM MEMBERS
Roger Miles
Author
Natural History Museum, London
Citation
ISSN
:
0892-4996
Publication Name:
Visitor Behavior
Volume:
9
Number:
3
Page Number:
4
If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.