Skip to main content
COMMUNITY:
Peer-reviewed article

The conflation of motives of science communication — causes, consequences, remedies

June 14, 2019 | Media and Technology, Public Programs

We explore and discuss the diverse motives that drive science communication, pointing out that political motives are the major driving force behind most science communication programmes including so-called public engagement with science with the result that educational and promotional objectives are blurred and science communication activities are rarely evaluated meaningfully. Since this conflation of motives of science communication and the gap between political rhetoric and science communication practice could threaten the credibility of science, we argue for the restoration of a crucial distinction between two types of science communication: educational/dialogic vs promotional/persuasive.

TEAM MEMBERS

  • Peter Weingart
    Author
    Stellenbosch University
  • Marina Joubert
    Author
    Stellenbosch University
  • Citation

    ISSN : 1824-2049
    DOI : 10.22323/2.18030401
    Publication Name: Journal of Science Communication
    Volume: 18
    Number: 3
    Resource Type: Research Products
    Discipline: General STEM
    Audience: Administration/Leadership/Policymakers | General Public | Museum/ISE Professionals | Scientists
    Environment Type: Media and Technology | Public Programs

    If you would like to edit a resource, please email us to submit your request.